Who Killed William In Frankenstein?

Click to rate!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

The monster kills William, the creator’s younger brother, by pressing his throat closed so that he can’t breathe. The creature is not alone in being blamed. Victor Frankenstein’s irresponsible behavior causes the tragedy in the first place. It was undoubtedly stupid to blame the monster for the murder and to ignore Victor Frankenstein’s ill-mannered conduct.

Victor Frankenstein is a six-year-old boy. He has done nothing wrong to be murdered, and he is certainly not the only one who thinks so. The world, however, does not exist in which justice flourishes; Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein demonstrates this point. The monster slaughters the youngster with his own hands.

The issue of why the monster kills William arises. His brother is to blame for the creature’s existence. Furthermore, like other humans, he judges appearances. Nonetheless, it does not imply that the murderer is at fault.

Here’s why: Victor, the monster’s creator, leaves him alone. It leads to negative consequences including the deaths of several characters and much misery. Living things seek love, and if they do not receive it, they become bad.

Victor is unthinking and spiritually blind despite his pleasant childhood. It’s reasonable to hold that he is responsible for William’s murder. Without a doubt, everything would be better if the guy accepted responsibility for his creation.

Both Victor and the monster are absolved of responsibility for William’s death, and they are both executed. Unfortunately, Justine is found guilty of the boy’s murder. It becomes clear during Justine’s trial that injustice thrives in the world. The woman isn’t capable of committing a crime, so others recognize it.

In the end, she is held responsible for William’s death by those in power. Victor doesn’t inform him that he knows who murdered his brother, and Justine is left to suffer on her own. Even though he regrets the woman’s death, he does nothing to stop it.

Besides, bear in mind that the monster pressed William’s throat, preventing him from breathing when you consider if he is guilty or not. Most cases would probably justify his behavior.

The monster kills a young boy with his own hands and is accountable for it. “I too am able to bring havoc; my foe is not invincible; this death will send him into despair and thousand other pains will torment and destroy him,” says the creature in return. For abandoning him alone, the being takes revenge on his creator.

Victor, on the other hand, leads to the deaths of numerous people and significant suffering. He creates the monster that kills his brother and other close relatives; he refuses to care for it. Frankenstein is not a story about one monster but two characters in Mary Shelley’s tale. Without a doubt, Victor should be charged with murder since he refuses to accept responsibility for his actions.

After her mother dies, Justine becomes a housekeeper for the Frankenstein family. When William is murdered, the monster takes a picture from his hand and accuses her of murder. She falsely confesses to the crime as a result of her fear of going to Hell. She is put to death by being hanged.

The monster, in addition to the individuals he truly murders, also causes the death of a few others indirectly. Justine is an early example of this. Alphonse is another good example. This is fascinating. If we hold the beast responsible for unintentionally causing deaths, then Victor must be held accountable as well.

The truth is that the monster was created by Victor, and it killed William—if not, Justine would have been executed. However, if Victor hadn’t developed the creature, it wouldn’t have killed William.

Right? Once you start thinking about Frankenstein in this way, you immediately raise a slew of questions regarding blame and morality, and responsibility. That’s sort of the idea behind contemplating Frankenstein at all.

Even if Justine is domestic in the Frankenstein home, she’s wonderful: “Being a servant in Geneva, unlike in England or France, ‘does not include the notion of ignorance and a loss of human dignity (6.5)” (6.7).

Anyway, Justine appears to be a nice young woman. She’s “frank-hearted and happy,” and she gives thanks for the Frankenstein family’s generosity by being “the most grateful little creature in the world.” Of course, she’s also “very bright and kind, [and] very beautiful” (6.7-8).

Then she’s charged with murdering William Frankenstein. Yeah, it makes no sense to anybody, but she was discovered with a photograph he had (the monster planted it on her), so it doesn’t look good for her. Then she really goes and tells people about everything that happened to her when the creature kidnapped her. Why? Because she is Catholic.

Elizabeth previously informed us that she is religious—she believes that owing to her excessive love for others, people whom she loves to die as a punishment for loving them too much—which is supposed to help us understand why she confesses: the priest (i.e., priest) persuades her that if she does not confess, she will to hell.

Justine isn’t a protagonist in her own right. She’s a one-of-a-kind antireligious character, and she also acts as a reminder that while God isn’t murdering people she cares about because of anything she’s done, the monster is doing it. In other words, don’t shift the blame to God; it’s your fault.