A creature with a human-like intellect is described in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Despite being created by the protagonist’s questionable actions, his mind is similar to that of a human. He is not a zombie since he is made up of body parts from several sources and has an existence.
The creature has been dubbed a “zombie,” “golem,” or various other names. The argument continues over whether it is a zombie or a golem. It was created from human body parts. Rather than calling it a zombie, it’s more accurate to refer to it as a golem, or a construction. Furthermore, in recent episodes, the Creature has demonstrated that it was self-aware and acted of its own free will.
Frankenstein, in a refusal to recognize his creation, refused to give the monster a name. It was an attempt not to ascribe it to identity. Despite his lack of attention, the Creature grew strong feelings for others.
Victor Frankenstein created a creature that was made up of human body parts from various people. Because it was alive rather than a mindless animated corpse, the Monster is not undead.
In reality, he was not compelled to do anything or follow orders like zombies are in fictional novels. The creature might learn, but it had to start with the basics. He had no prior knowledge.
Victor felt responsible for the golem’s misdeeds since his creator’s sins were passed on to him. To produce new life, Frankenstein employed a scientific method. He disregarded religious restrictions that resulted in a deadly outcome and numerous fatalities.
The Creature is a reanimated corpse that resembles a zombie, but the resemblance ends there. He’s made up of several different corpses that have been sewn together rather than one complete body. He isn’t resurrected through supernatural means or by a virus infection. He doesn’t consume human brains, to say the least.
The primary distinction between a traditional or folklore zombie and the Creature is that zombies have no voluntary, autonomous, or intellectual capacity. Zombies in Haitian folklore were formerly dead or heavily drugged people who were enslaved by malevolent sorcerers.
Pop culture zombies are unable to think; instead, they simply lurch forward growling and murmuring about brains. They’re just lifeless things that can walk around. The Creature himself is portrayed similarly in popular culture.
In the film, on the other hand, the monster isn’t a lifeless thing that can be moved. He is very much alive and has a mind as sharp and capable as any human, perhaps even more so considering everything he’s able to learn in such a short period of time. He is bright and eloquent. He isn’t really a monster at all; rather, he appears to be one since that’s what everyone expects him to be.
Is it possible to consider Frankenstein’s Monster a zombie, considering that he is a reanimated corpse from many contributors? I’m thinking of putting zombies and the F-Monster in the same experiment.
The monster from Frankenstein is not a reanimated corpse. He’s a brand new living creature with everything that entails, including thinking, feeling, and existing. In the book, he’s quite brilliant.
You could make an argument for him being a golem, but even for a flesh golem, he doesn’t quite fit the mold. Zombies in today’s vernacular are brainless undead beings who feed on human brains; or mindless slaves of a voodoo priest in a more traditional sense.