Which Statement Best Describes Laertes’s Development Between Act I And Act IV?

Click to rate!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Gertrude’s demeanor has a detrimental impact on her self-assurance. In the play’s story, what purpose does Gertrude’s reaction serve? Which statement best characterizes Laertes’s development from Act I to Act IV? He becomes more interested in attaining political office.

Laertes is a good guy in Act I. In Act IV, he disregards all of the social norms and isn’t concerned whether his actions are correct. Laertes is a youth who has little logical thinking and warmth as well as patience.

Laertes begins his service to King Claudius at the beginning of the play, loyally doing everything he’s asked. He is involved in palace intrigues and carries out all of his espionage tasks. Hamlet dies from a poisoned sword in the final fight, as Claudio kills Laertes.

The first encounter with the character occurs in the castle’s reception hall. In appeal and appearance, one of the courtiers considers him to be a genuine gent. Laertes’ sense of right and wrong was formed by his father.

Hamlet, on the other hand, is weighed down by home duties. Hamlet wants to leave Elsinore because of all the housework he has to do. It’s difficult to believe that he truly cares for his father when you consider how much time he spends with him.

Ophelia says that her brother isn’t always associated with words and actions: “He’s a careless and empty reveler.” According to Ophelia, Laertes is a “careless and empty reveler.” In his own way, he is honest, energetic, and bold. He treasured his sister greatly and prayed for her wellbeing and happiness.

Laertes is eager to investigate the guilty, even if it’s the king himself, with whom he swore his loyalty. He is unconcerned about how his father died. Laertes is uninterested in whether or not he was correct. He has no time for rumination. His demeanor is irritable. He wants to get this over with as quickly as possible and applies equal retaliation guidelines in executing justice.

Laertes didn’t consider why his father died, and as a result, he was oblivious to the fact that Polonius himself had killed him. Laertes was also blinded by tradition.

Laertes is a man driven by a desire for vengeance, as Polonius’ second son. The condition of Polonius’ youngster is understandable until he collaborates with the king.

It’s difficult to take Laertes seriously when he enters a fight against the prince armed with poisoned weapons. He betrayed his knighthood, his honor, and his generosity as well. In Hamlet’s opinion, only the proximity of his death allowed him to confess the truth.